In a way that is a rather disturbing answer, because clause 38 already states:""The Comptroller and Auditor General continues by that name to be a corporation sole.""
I am still concerned about what the precise necessity is for the clause. It might be a belt-and-braces approach, but I still cannot see why it is necessary.
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Howarth
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 4 November 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
498 c943
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 00:20:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592043
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592043
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592043