My Lords, the three noble Lords who have spoken on this group have made some strong points, but what is missing from the debate is an independent balance between security, the economic case and safety. Of course, safety and security are paramount but no one in the appeal mechanism—which ends up with the Secretary of State—represents the economic side; only the security side is represented. I am not expecting my noble friend to answer now—it is a wacky idea I had when I was listening to the other contributions—but I wonder whether the CAA has a role to play in this. It is independent and has an economic regulation role—it happens in other industries—and it could well, in addition to the ideas put forward by my noble friend Lord Rosser, which I fully support, give comfort to the operators if someone was looking at the independent economic regulation along with other matters. I look forward to my noble friend’s response.
Policing and Crime Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Berkeley
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 October 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
713 c629-30 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:25:33 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_586444
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_586444
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_586444