Those matters have been considered and the Bill has been carefully looked after through both places. I hope that we are about to make it law, and we do not wish to risk all at this stage. The amendments might be attractive, but the Bill is not, as it has been described, costume jewellery. It has authority and it will make a difference. Those at the Law Commission have considered this matter carefully, and it is their view that this Bill is suited to their purposes and provides a useful addition to the statutory provisions relating to the commission. The allegation has been made that the idea for these changes came from the Ministry of Justice, but the Law Commission might wish to claim the original idea, which was then subject to negotiation between the two.
The Law Commission believe that the Bill is suited to its purposes and it supports it. It is certainly concerned that we might lose all at this very late stage—
Law Commission Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Emily Thornberry
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 16 October 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Law Commission Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
497 c586 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:30:32 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584807
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584807
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584807