My hon. Friend raises an important point, which, as he is aware, is the nub of the Bill. One thing that puzzles me about all this reporting and designation is that the Bill says throughout that it should be done by the Lord Chancellor. If a future Government—or this Government for that matter—were to abolish the position of Lord Chancellor, as Tony Blair sought to do three years ago, would that totally invalidate the Bill if it had become an Act?
Law Commission Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Simon Burns
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 16 October 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Law Commission Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
497 c582 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:16:44 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584795
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584795
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584795