My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister for his reply. It is important to put this in some perspective. It would not come into force for another six years or so. It would then set the pattern for our system of education for this group of young people for at least 10 or 20 years, so we should be willing to raise our sights. I am not completely happy with the reply. Perhaps we will have to come back to this on Report. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 206 withdrawn.
Clause 90, as amended, agreed.
Clause 91: Meaning of "apprenticeship place"
Amendments 207 and 208 not moved.
Clause 91 agreed.
Clause 92 agreed.
Clause 93: Apprenticeship scheme requirements
Amendments 209 and 210 not moved.
Clause 93 agreed.
Clause 94: Apprenticeship scheme requirements: interpretation
Debate on whether Clause 94 should stand part of the Bill.
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Layard
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 October 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
713 c348 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:12:48 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584588
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584588
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584588