Although broadly I very much agree with that point and I think that in time the failure of Lehman Brothers will not be seen as the great mistake that conventional wisdom suggests it is, is not the problem the nature of the guarantee? Whereas all of us would accept, I think, that depositors should have their interests guaranteed—there is now an implicit if not an explicit guarantee that all deposits will be guaranteed by the Government—the difficulty that arose in relation to many of the banks that have had problems in the past 12 months is that bond holders also had that guarantee. The extension of that guarantee is relevant in relation to the idea of institutions being too big to fail. The issue is not simply size, but the nature of the guarantees that any Government give.
City of London
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Field
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 October 2009.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on City of London.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
497 c108WH 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-05 22:49:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584333
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584333
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584333