My Lords, Amendment 149 seeks to require the Secretary of State to consult the Lord Chief Justice and other appropriate persons before publishing draft guidance on Part 4. Perhaps I should explain my understanding of how this issue came about. There was debate in the other place about whether the definition of "gang" might be set out in guidance, as the noble Baroness laid out. It was suggested that, if this were to be the case, the guidance might be given a stronger statutory basis and a greater degree of parliamentary scrutiny. As noble Lords will be aware, the definition is now set out firmly in Clause 33. Given that, I believe that it would be acceptable for guidance simply to be laid before Parliament before publication.
However, because the Government do not disagree in principle with consulting relevant persons before publishing guidance, and because there is every intention that we will do so—as well as because of the weight of feeling within this place—I am happy to agree the amendment in principle, and the Government are willing to return with an amendment of this nature on Report.
Policing and Crime Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord West of Spithead
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 October 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
713 c213 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:16:37 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583646
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583646
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583646