My Lords, these two amendments would amend Clause 33(4) and Clause 34 to ensure that an injunction may only be made subject to Clause 34, which sets out a list of prohibitions and requirements. They would also remove Clause 34(6), which makes clear that the provisions are intended to be a non-exhaustive list of prohibitions and requirements. We are uneasy that the court should be allowed to require or prohibit anything as long as it falls within the purpose of Clause 33. We are interested to hear from the Minister just how wide he thinks the list should be. It would be helpful if he were to give some examples. I beg to move.
Policing and Crime Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 October 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
713 c176 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:14:31 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583590
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583590
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583590