The point is that if we need a three-year period to pilot something and that pilot is going to be carried out by an external provider, if we were to seek to do it in two chunks rather than under one contractual arrangement there is a risk that fewer potential providers would come forward to engage in the pilot. They will factor into the contractual terms on which they are prepared to undertake the work the prospect that the pilot might not be renewed at the end of, say, 18 months. The facility for them to have the assuredness of a three-year pilot—if that is the judgment as to the length of pilot needed to test the proposition—is a commercial benefit. That is why there is a value-for-money component.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 June 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c75GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:23:37 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_571915
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_571915
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_571915