UK Parliament / Open data

Geneva Conventions and United Nations Personnel (Protocols) Bill [Lords]

This has been a fascinating and informative debate, not least because we have found out the birthday and occupation of the Minister's relations. It is always interesting to have some new information and some anecdotes to lighten the debate. This is an important debate on an important Bill, which the Government are right to introduce and ensure that the UK passes. To people in this country, the red cross is seen not as a religious symbol but as something entirely neutral. However, if that is not the case in some places in the world, and if that can lead to confusion and, potentially, endanger people who are doing important work, it is obviously right that the international community should act to change the situation. I am sure we have all received information and leaflets from the ICRC encouraging us to support the Bill. We have had some debate about the origins of the cross and how it has been used by different cultures. In some contexts, the red cross is obviously seen as religious, but it is worth bearing in mind the fact that it is the reversal of the Swiss flag, and therefore represents neutrality. I was intrigued by the Bill's description of the crystal, which it defines as""the emblem of a red frame in the shape of a square on edge on a white ground, conforming to the illustration in Article 1 of the Annex to the third protocol"." As was remarked upon in previous stages, this Bill is one of the first to include a diagram.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
493 c836-7 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top