My Lords, I am most grateful to those who have supported this amendment and I say to the noble Lord, Lord Greenway, that we do not want to spoil anybody’s pleasure in recreational activities on the sea or in the sea. It is a question of getting the right balance and not forgetting that those who are enjoying the pleasures of the sea are not ruining somebody else’s enjoyment of a beautiful seascape.
I did not hear the Minister, in his remarks, specifically answer the four points that I raised about the marine policy statement, although he was able to give some new reassurance about it and about the proposed functioning of the marine planning system. I do not fully understand why a definition of "seascape" is so difficult, especially when there is a perfectly adequate one in the high-level objectives document I quoted. Nevertheless, I appreciate that this is a very complex area and we want to get it absolutely right. Since we are aware that work is ongoing in getting it right, I will live in hopes of another opportunity to see this enshrined in primary legislation. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 110C withdrawn.
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hooper
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 May 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c1024 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 11:34:25 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556930
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556930
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556930