UK Parliament / Open data

Business Rate Supplements Bill

I do not share the noble Earl’s view that that is likely. Frankly, it is not in anyone’s interests to come forward with a fraudulent prospectus, which is what it would be. The prospectus will have to be tested against outcomes, criteria and hard questions of project management. The funding elements of that will have to be specific and evidenced. With the best will in the world, projects change—there might be cost overruns, for example—and the reason why we say that the prospectus has to spell out how underspends or overspends will be dealt with is precisely that that discipline must be there for the partners to be able to deal with such an situation.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c331-2GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top