Yet. I was going to say that the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, was a third, but I mean the first; he is indeed here, and I would be the third. I am also a former London borough councillor and member of the Greater London Authority, with the consequent loyalties to both those areas that one retains; and am director of a charity, the Rose Theatre in Kingston, which is a business paying business rates.
I should say to the noble Lord, Lord Bates, that I will start by being negative, but I shall end by being positive; that is probably the right way round. I do not see how the amendment would operate. What is sufficient income? That seems quite a subjective phrase. Is it sufficient in an account dealing just with the BRS project, or overall? It could be interpreted in a number of ways. I am not sure what "local income" means in this context. I realised that there was a typo in the amendment; I just assumed that the word should not have been there at all so that we were talking about "sufficient income". If it should be "sufficient local income", I have to say that local authorities do not have that much local income; the amount has varied over the years. We on these Benches say that what is raised locally is not enough, the balance is all wrong, and so on, but I will not embark down the policy road. I am unclear how the two words would affect the noble Lord’s objective.
The noble Lord is right to raise the issue. I had assumed that Clause 10 covered a variation in the amount of business rate supplements, and that it could be varied up or down. There certainly needs to be a mechanism to reduce BRS during a project if it turns out to be less expensive than had been thought or circumstances change. Schedule 2 provides for credits and refunds, but only at the end of the project. I recall seeing somewhere in the debates in the Commons that the Minister, Mr Healey, said that refunds were provided for, but I cannot see where. I look forward to exploring how we can achieve something, even if I do not quite go along with this amendment.
Business Rate Supplements Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hamwee
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 May 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Business Rate Supplements Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c286-7GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:21:28 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555551
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555551
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555551