I am sorry, but the Minister has not answered my question or that of the noble Lord, Lord Newby: why there should be any need for flexibility around a definition by reference to "ordinary residence". How could the Government ever define this scheme by anything other than "ordinary residence"? We accept that there may be some need for flexibility in some of the detail, for people such as Crown servants—other categories may come in over time. However, one of the issues that I raised was why that bit is required to be in secondary legislation, not primary. Powers to make secondary legislation should be restricted to things that might change over time, not things that should be fixed points.
Saving Gateway Accounts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 April 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Saving Gateway Accounts Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c314GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:06:30 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546277
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546277
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546277