It will be in place next month.
We listened with interest—as always, of course—to what the hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge had to say, and we understood from his speech that he disagrees with the Government. What many people are puzzled about, though, is why the Conservatives have so little to offer in this crisis—a point made very powerfully by my right hon. Friend the Member for Oldham, West and Royton (Mr. Meacher). Why have they so failed, over a period, to set out some vision for the future—a credible response to the unprecedented economic challenges that we face?
One reason is simple: recent events have destroyed a linchpin of Tory ideology, and the Tories have not yet found anything to put in its place. The Tory party is ideologically wedded to deregulation. When we legislated for the Financial Services Authority 10 years ago, the then shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury said:""we believe that regulation should be minimal""
and that one of their concerns about the Bill was""the danger of over-regulation."—[Official Report, 28 June 1999; Vol. 334, c. 42-44.]"
The Tory critique was that the FSA was an example of over-regulation.
The Economy
Proceeding contribution from
Stephen Timms
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 31 March 2009.
It occurred during Debate on The Economy.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
490 c889 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:45:02 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545318
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545318
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545318