Hon. Members have made a powerful case for suspending Sri Lanka from the Commonwealth, and there has been talk of the Harare declaration. Of course, Zimbabwe has been suspended from the Commonwealth with very little effect. I wonder whether suspension from the Commonwealth only really makes sense as a stepping stone and a rallying point to a UN resolution, and whether in practical terms—other than giving voice to a subject that does not have a proper voice in the UK—it would not actually be that substantive to the Government of Sri Lanka unless it led to the next stepping stone, which would be a full UN resolution.
Sri Lanka and the Commonwealth
Proceeding contribution from
James Duddridge
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 March 2009.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Sri Lanka and the Commonwealth.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
490 c35WH 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-11 18:10:11 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_542510
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_542510
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_542510