The hon. Lady says that my record is second to none, but my record is second to hers, and I acknowledge her contribution to the debate. She is absolutely right: if we are to ensure that cases do not go to court, or go to court and are resolved properly, there will have to be statutory force behind what we want to achieve. My only question is whether the Bill is the right sort of statutory force. I note that the clauses are all about the duty to "promote" and "recognise". Those are mealy-mouthed expressions, in legislative terms. They give local authorities a wealth of opportunities to say, "We are promoting this. You'll have to prove that we're not promoting it before you can achieve your objective." If the Bill goes into Committee, I will want the Committee to explore whether those are the right levels of assurance for local authorities and public bodies.
Autism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Stephen Ladyman
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 27 February 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Autism Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
488 c507 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:52:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_532662
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_532662
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_532662