My noble friend is right that I am not going to withdraw the amendment with confidence, though I will withdraw it with hope. Having listened very carefully to what the Minister said and to his careful and thorough discussion of this issue, I think that he was arguing in favour of accepting my amendment rather than rejecting it. His arguments were impeccable, but they were not logical in relation to the words that we have here.
If the concept of sustainability in relation to development applies only within the borders of the UK marine zone in terms of the MPS or of each planning area, important areas are missed out. The noble Lord dismissed the idea that the land might have relevance, but what you do in the sea along the coast has a huge effect on the land. It is not just what happens in the sea that matters, but what happens on the seaward or oceanward edge of the UK marine area and beyond.
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Greaves
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 February 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c1095 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-16 20:43:42 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_527971
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_527971
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_527971