Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]

I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, for her kind comments about Friday. I did indeed have fun, not just because of the questions but because my feet were constantly being nuzzled by David Blunkett’s dog throughout the programme, which was an interesting experience. I thank the Minister for her detailed response, but I would raise two issues. The Minister accepts that the organisations on the list—parish councils and the organisations outlined below—are very different both in the way that they are set up and funded and, more importantly, in the resourcing of their back offices, which would respond to items such as petitions. Therefore, I ask the Minister to take that on board and consider it carefully in terms of those organisations’ resources. She stated that the Government would be able to meet any such bills. I am sure that she is aware of the diversity of funding for parish councils, in the process, amount and commitment, both financial and other, from various local authorities. How would the cost of those extra duties be met by the Government? Would there be any direct funding to parish councils? Would it be given to local authorities? Would there then be a duty on local authorities to ensure that it was passed on? There are still questions which need to be looked at. I would be obliged if the Minister could take them back. We may have to return to them on Report, but it may be possible to clarify some of them before then. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 134 withdrawn. Clause 20 agreed. Amendments 135 and 135A not moved. Clause 21 : Orders Clause 21 : Orders Clause 21 agreed. Clause 22: Interpretation Clause 22: Interpretation Amendments 136 and 137 not moved. Clause 22 agreed.