The noble Lord raises an important point. We were referring to the principal local authorities that are liaising fairly regularly with their connected authorities and promoting the information that they are providing. Certainly, we will look at some specific examples and, if possible, write to the noble Lord on that point.
While I am speaking, it is important to acknowledge the point made by the noble Baroness, Lady Maddock, about guidance suffocating innovation. I take that point on board, because it is important. Any form of bureaucracy, or what is seen to be prescription, does stifle innovation. We certainly do not wish to do that. I know that there is a fine balance between prescription and trying to offer some clarification. We have used the phrase ““light-touch guidance””, and we are genuinely trying to achieve that. We want a real balance in offering clarification that would be helpful and that would be light touch and not stifle innovation in the process.
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Patel of Bradford
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 January 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c9GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:38:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522372
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522372
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522372