The right hon. Gentleman is, of course, correct that I have not yet heard the rest of his speech, but I have reread the statement that the Prime Minister gave to the House on similar themes on 18 December. He said that our relationship with Iraq would be"““the realisation of a normal defence relationship, similar to those we have with our other key partners in the region””.—[Official Report, 18 December 2008; Vol. 485, c. 1235.]"
We do not have strategic relationships with other countries in the region; we have friendly, normal relations. I suggest again to the Secretary of State that a strategic relationship implies an ongoing, substantial commitment, such as the United States will certainly have to the overall defence of Iraq. As I understand, it is no part of the British Government's policy that we should give long-term commitments similar to those being offered by the United States.
Iraq: Future Strategic Relationship
Proceeding contribution from
Malcolm Rifkind
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 January 2009.
It occurred during Debate on Iraq: Future Strategic Relationship.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
486 c240 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-16 21:45:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_518298
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_518298
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_518298