I entirely agree with the intention to protect the use of FSCS funds, and that intention is behind some of the amendments tabled by the hon. Member for Fareham (Mr. Hoban). I hope that my comments today have been helpful for those who observe these things closely.
We have included a number of safeguards over the use of such moneys, including, as I have mentioned, a cap and the independent verification of any resolution costs. However, the hon. Gentleman's amendments are not the right way to proceed to protect the use of such funds. I sense that he does not want to push this group of amendments to a Division, although, as he said earlier, he may want to push the principle of excluding from the Bill a power to establish pre-funding. That would be a serious mistake, but if he wants to vote on it, so be it.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause read a Second time, and added to the Bill.
Banking Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Ian Pearson
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 November 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Banking Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
483 c809 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:17:58 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_512495
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_512495
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_512495