The point that my hon. Friend the Member for Northampton, North made was raised in error, because the new subsection to which she referred does not ban the activity she mentions, but licenses it. It would be banned"““except in pursuance of a licence.””"
Those were the words that she failed to mention. The new subsection states in full:"““ No person shall—""(a) mix human gametes with animal gametes,""(b) bring about the creation of a human admixed embryo, or""(c) keep or use a human admixed embryo,""except in pursuance of a licence.””"
It licenses the very activity that my hon. Friend is trying to say is not permitted by the Bill.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Durkan
(Social Democratic & Labour Party)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 22 October 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
481 c357 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:28:06 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506445
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506445
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506445