Having served on the Committee, I continue to welcome the thrust of the Bill. It is certainly a step in the right direction.
I want to comment on two of the new clauses, beginning with new clause 24. There is still an anomaly that is failing vulnerable children. As recently as April 2005, Mr. Justice Munby said in a ruling that local authorities' plans for looked-after children in prison were ““little more than worthless””. We must think about the level at which we start, and what we need to do to achieve what such children deserve.
We know from speaking to children in custody—and I know from my experience of dealing with children in the youth justice system in Cheshire—that they value the relationship that they have with a social worker, particularly the individual meetings to discuss private issues that they cannot share with anyone else. Maintaining the stability of such support is essential.
At present there are two separate organisations, the Youth Justice Board and the looked-after children's services, which are not working together in planning the future of children in care and in custody but working in parallel, and the youth justice system dominates the process. Those who speak to social workers will find that many are very confused about their role in relation to children in care and custody. We need to put that right, and to give social workers a key role in children's lives while they are in custody. They need to fit seamlessly into the process, and to work along with the youth justice system to ensure positive outcomes for children in care and custody, rather than the poor outcomes that we are currently seeing. At present, we see placement breakdowns after custody, high reoffending rates and missed education and employment opportunities, often when children are at the most critical stage of their childhood.
I urge the Minister to consider that issue carefully. The new clause gives the Government a chance to put the anomaly right, and to ensure that the children who, in many respects, are perhaps the most vulnerable in the custody system have the support that they require and deserve as looked-after children, which is what they should be. The section 20 voluntary accommodation must be put into the same category for looked-after children in custody as for all other children who are placed under section 31 care orders. The children require that, and we need to deliver.
Children and Young Persons Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Edward Timpson
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 October 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Children and Young Persons Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
480 c337-8 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 01:31:50 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_498260
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_498260
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_498260