The hon. Gentleman talks about the suffering of badgers. As he will be aware, section 6 of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 allows someone to put down a badger if it is seriously injured or in such a condition that to do so"““would be an act of mercy””."
That is what the law currently says.
I understand the frustration felt by those with closed herds, but the evidence from the randomised badger culling trial was that the reaction would be, ““I've got a closed herd, there are badgers, it must have come from them, let's cull them.”” That is reactive culling, and the evidence was very clear that reactive culling makes the disease worse. That may not be what people would assume to be the answer to the question, but it is. A lot of badgers were culled in order to provide that information, on the basis of which I have made my judgment.
Bovine TB
Proceeding contribution from
Hilary Benn
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 7 July 2008.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on Bovine TB.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
478 c1163 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:23:44 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490332
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490332
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_490332