I made the point in Committee that post-combustion capture of carbon is the most inefficient method, but that is the direction that the Government are taking. As a chemist, I know that pre-combustion capture allows us to generate chemicals, especially hydrogen. Why have we chosen post-combustion capture?
Energy Security
Proceeding contribution from
Brian Iddon
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 June 2008.
It occurred during Opposition day on Energy Security.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
478 c629 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 01:56:33 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487851
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487851
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_487851