I agree with large parts of the Freud report. The hon. Gentleman is right to say that Freud recommends introducing far more variety of supply into the welfare-to-work arena so that more organisations, particular those in the third and charitable sectors, can get involved in getting people in hard-to-reach groups back to work. Also, we must ensure that organisations are paid by results over an extended period. It is not enough to give someone a couple of brief courses, get them into a job and then wash our hands of them. We must ensure that the job is sustainable and that the person remains in work for an appreciable period. In a previous report, the Committee recommended that the person should be in work for at least a year before the welfare-to-work agency receives full payment. That would help to ensure that the problems mentioned by the hon. Gentleman are avoided.
Deprivation/Child Poverty
Proceeding contribution from
John Penrose
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 June 2008.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Deprivation/Child Poverty.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
477 c316WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:46:43 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_484634
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_484634
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_484634