I am grateful for noble Lords’ support for the amendment and for the comments of the Minister, in particular those on bringing profit-making alongside non-profit-making. I understand her reasons for that not always being appropriate and was grateful for her guidance.
I turn to the substantive point incorporated in many of my amendments. The Minister addressed fully the transfer of land, to which Clause 252 relates. I have always known that the Secretary of State’s consent is required under Clause 253(4) before a transfer of land can be imposed, so that is not the most serious of the ways in which the regulator’s powers are being extended beyond cases where mismanagement is proved. I was concentrating more on Clause 248, on management transfer, and Clause 250, which gives powers to appoint the management and staff of the organisation. I was less than entirely satisfied by the Minister’s response on those points. It is likely that that I will return to the matter later. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 110ABB not moved.]
Clause 248 agreed to.
Clause 249 [Section 248: supplemental]:
Housing and Regeneration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Best
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 18 June 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c432GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:28:39 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_483406
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_483406
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_483406