UK Parliament / Open data

Counter-Terrorism Bill (Programme) (No. 2)

I basically agree with my hon. and learned Friend. However, it is possible that both the Government proposal and his amendment might preclude a defendant or offender from being re-questioned if they wished to be so in order to clarify what they had said before. Perhaps we should consider whether the changes should be drafted in such a way as to make it plain that an offender could request re-questioning in order to clarify something or for some other reason.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
477 c188 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top