I am grateful to the Minister and his colleagues, who have clearly taken the issue seriously. I read into this an argument that I am inclined to—I will not say ““accept””—understand. My understanding comes from the fact that responsibility for the Government’s actions if things go wrong lies with the Government. I consequently understand the need for caution.
The Minister told us that there will be consultations in the summer on the need for a legal definition. If the experts from Salford who have advised me say that there is a need, that is not the end of it; they could be right or wrong. If we are told that there is no need for this, the Government must look at the consequences of saying that to the financial world, to landowners and fund providers.
I will withdraw the amendment and consult colleagues outside. This will not go away. Everyone in the room wishes it not to go away; it is a question of how we can make it go forward with a little more speed. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 80 agreed to.
Clause 81 [Provider of social housing]:
Housing and Regeneration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Graham of Edmonton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 June 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c225-6GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:31:19 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480250
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480250
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480250