Let me make a little progress; I will give way to the hon. Gentleman in a few moments.
Will the Minister also clarify what would be allowed under the term ““serious”” that would not be allowed under ““life-threatening”” or seriously impairing the ““quality of life””? If there are any serious differences, the Committee should know what they are. I understand from lawyers—I say this in response to an earlier intervention—that neither ““serious”” nor ““quality of life”” provides the utopian phraseology that would be needed to ensure that this provision is drafted as tightly as it should be.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Simmonds
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 May 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
476 c104 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 01:41:08 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_474258
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_474258
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_474258