UK Parliament / Open data

Royal Mail and the Post Office

Proceeding contribution from David Drew (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 May 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Royal Mail and the Post Office.
I agree entirely. My last point is about investment and innovation, so I shall come to my right hon. Friend's question after making my penultimate point. Although it is controversial to say so, there is a serious problem with the leadership of Royal Mail and the Post Office. The double act of Leighton and Crozier, which was regarded as a marriage made in heaven, has been an unmitigated disaster. They have taken Manchester United and turned it into Derby, to use a football analogy. I am afraid that, if the Government have not yet given them a vote of no confidence, it is about time that they did, because we have had both a dispute that was lamentably handled and the closures, in respect of which no one seems to know the strategy, other than that there must be 2,500 of them. They will blame the Government, but perhaps the Government ought to say, ““It would help if you knew what you were doing in terms of the closures.”” We have rehearsed that argument, and I will not go through it again. I am apportioning the blame. At the end of the day, people are being paid millions of pounds to sort out this matter, and when that is not being done, we must look at the people at the top, and it is about time that we did so. Having said that, I will be for ever held up in the Communication Workers Union's hall of fame. Nevertheless, having attended various demonstrations, it is difficult to be told, as a Government Member of Parliament, what the top people are earning to shut down all the facilities that we want to keep open.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
475 c451-2WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Back to top