The supertram experience has left a bitter taste. The Manchester and Nottingham extensions and the Edinburgh scheme have been given the go-ahead, despite similar costs and a significantly worse cost-benefit ratio, so it is clear when it comes to decisions on transport that it is one rule for some regions and another for Yorkshire.
We are united across the political spectrum; indeed council leaders from all parties and all the city's MPs have made the same case, but all we hear from the Minister is that small is beautiful. I am disappointed. Unlike Ministers for Health, whose job is clearly to promote health, it seems that the Minister for Yorkshire and the Humber is not meant to promote Yorkshire—she represents the Government to Yorkshire, not Yorkshire to the Government. That is extremely regrettable.
I have three questions for the Minister. First, when are we going to get a fair deal on transport in Yorkshire? Secondly, when will the Government take seriously the transport issues that are hampering regional development? Thirdly, when will we stop being bottom of the league for transport spending? We are not prepared to put up with that, and we will keep saying so until we get the fair deal that the people of Yorkshire and the Humber deserve.
Transport Infrastructure (Yorkshire and Humberside)
Proceeding contribution from
Greg Mulholland
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 March 2008.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Transport Infrastructure (Yorkshire and Humberside).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
473 c34WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:41:20 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454224
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454224
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454224