The hon. Gentleman can use whatever name he wants for the Foreign Minister, the president and the diplomatic corps, but they still exist. Let me quote the Foreign Affairs Committee. It has a Labour majority, and the Labour Government are trying to sell us the idea that there is nothing to worry about. The FAC says:"““the Government risks underestimating, and certainly is downplaying in public, the importance and potential of the new foreign policy institutions established by the Lisbon Treaty, namely the new High Representative””—"
I do not care what the person is called; he is a Foreign Minister—"““and the European External Action Service””—"
the European diplomatic service."““We recommend that the Government should publicly acknowledge the significance of the foreign policy aspects of the Lisbon Treaty.””"
Even a Labour-dominated Committee of this House was prepared to accept that there is something in the treaty that the Government had said that they did not want, but which they had got. The Government then said, ““It doesn't matter because we're not really concerned about it,”” and told us that we were scaremongering.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Sammy Wilson
(Democratic Unionist Party)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 March 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
473 c225 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:16:09 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454131
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454131
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454131