That is the argument that I started with. We cannot have it both ways. If someone says, ““They're already protected and these things are all going to happen automatically anyway, so there'll be no difference for the employee””, there is no great problem with the legislation, so how can it be burdensome and problematic? We cannot have it both ways.
Private Equity (Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
John Heppell
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 7 March 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Private Equity (Transfer of Undertakings and Protection of Employment) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c2037;472 c2035 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:59:04 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453145
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453145
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453145