My Lords, we support the amendment tabled by my noble friend and, indeed, we are pleased to see that the Government have taken this matter on board and tabled another amendment to a similar effect.
Both amendments provide for corrective action if targets are not met. However, Amendment No. 22 has the benefit of requiring action as soon as it appears that things are slipping and refers to what should be done if, "““it appears from the annual statement””"
that targets will not be met. So, if things are going wrong after year 2 or 3, corrective action can be put in place immediately, rather than, as in the Government’s amendment, Amendment No. 81, corrective action taking place only after the five-year budget period. My noble friend Lord Caithness said that the date in the Bill was 31 May in the second year following. That seems a long time before anything can actually happen. That is an unfortunate aspect of the Government’s amendment. I would be grateful if the Minister would have another look at this and see if he can combine the best parts of both amendments, so that corrective action can take place anyway at an earlier stage than that proposed in the Government’s amendment.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Cathcart
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 February 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c527 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:22:29 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_448149
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_448149
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_448149