UK Parliament / Open data

Climate Change Bill [HL]

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
My Lords, it would do. I am sorry; I should stick to the brief, really. ““Best possible advice”” means the climate change committee. The point is that the committee is small, but it itself will draw in advice in forming its position to come back to the Government and Parliament. It is not as though the five or six people appointed now will work in isolation; they themselves will be taking advice. As we know from the rest of the Bill, there can be sub-committees of other people. That is what I meant by ““the best possible advice””. I meant to say to my noble friend that the best possible advice is not the hunch of a Minister, or the hunch of a pressure group or some lobby group—it is the transparent advice from of the climate change committee. If that is not accepted, the procedures in the Bill are such that Ministers will have to be up-front at the Dispatch Box and very clear about why they are not accepting it. The default position is that the climate change committee’s advice will be accepted, and, if it is not, Ministers will have to explain to Parliament why not.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c480-1 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top