The inclusion of a charging clause in the Bill has been welcomed by local authorities. Some stakeholders have asked for further clarification of the clause. It is quite simple: all the costs incurred by a local authority, given its responsibilities under Part 2, may be recovered from the business partner. We recognise, however, that local authorities are likely to want more clarity about the operation of the scheme in practice, and that they will need support in interpreting their responsibilities and how to charge for them in practice. A specific requirement for them to seek advice from the LBRO on the approach that they should follow, as is proposed, is unnecessary. The Bill creates a provision for the LBRO to give guidance on the matter at Clause 31(2)(c). Guidance will tackle many of the issues associated with charging in practice, and local authorities must have regard to it when charging. Local authorities may also consult the LBRO, but the guidance clause takes away the need for any specific requirement for them to do so. I hope that that clarifies the position and will allow the noble Baroness to withdraw her amendment.
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bach
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c264GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:25:54 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439970
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439970
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439970