Unless I have misread this, that is precisely contrary to the note that I received, which states that the Local Government Association’s Commission on Climate Change recommended that local authorities are given flexibility to act and demonstrate what they can do before consideration of a duty. That is the note that I received from the Box. Clearly, I will go back and check that because it is contradictory. If it is wrong, naturally I will apologise. It would not be the first time that outside bodies have said one thing to Members and another to the Government, but I am not casting aspersions about that.
On the question asked by the noble Baroness, Lady Byford, I will do exactly what I said when I spoke earlier, although probably not to the extent that she desires. I will get the best available finance figures or another briefing sheet before Report so that we have something to work on.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rooker
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c316 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 01:09:27 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_438375
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_438375
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_438375