I hope that we can have clarity about this. I understand what the noble Lord, Lord Jones, said at Second Reading; that is, if there is a franchise which has more than one branch in different local authority areas, it plainly falls within the scope of the clause. However, if it is trading under the name of a multiple chain, but is nevertheless an individual franchise in only one local authority area, it is unlikely that it falls within Clause 20. Similarly, although a pub may come within an overall chain of pubs, its tenant, operating in a single authority, would not fall within Clause 20. We need clarity about this.
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Colville of Culross
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c149-50GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:31:48 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437792
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437792
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437792