moved Amendment No. 51:
51: Clause 15, page 7, line 10, after ““must”” insert ““lay before both Houses of Parliament and””
The noble Lord said: I also speak to Amendments Nos. 54 and 167. I have already had some encouragement on this group of amendments. All three obviously suggest that when guidance or directions are being given by the Secretary of State or the Welsh Ministers they should also be laid before Parliament. Parliament should be kept in the loop for fairly obvious reasons which I need not labour.
Amendment No. 167 is the most important. It refers to something we have not yet got to—it is much further forward in the Bill, in Clause 63. The relevant authority—the Government or Welsh Minister—must review after three years the power to impose fixed monetary penalties and so on: served stop notices and that sort of thing. Given the importance of fixed monetary penalties and stop notices, the result of that review should be presented to Parliament. That is even more important than the general guidance, which is dealt with in Amendments Nos. 51 and 54, but all three amendments are important. I beg to move.
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Cope of Berkeley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c141-2GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:27:39 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437763
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437763
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437763