I acknowledge the firm smack I have had from the noble Baroness, Lady Turner of Camden; I will reflect on that. A difficulty, a drawback recounted about this country in general terms—I do not mean over five or 10 years, but since the war—has been a reluctance to innovate, the danger that we prefer what is tried and tested. We often find pushing forward more difficult. I am anxious that, for better local regulation, nothing should inhibit people from innovating and trying new ways and approaches. That was the purpose behind my amendment.
I am not surprised that the Local Government Association opposes my amendment because it is just one more duty. I understand why people would find it easier to push it to one side. However, in the interests of UK plc and the prosperity of the country writ large, it has merit, notwithstanding the effective demolition job that the noble Baroness, Lady Turner of Camden, gave it. However, I will reflect carefully. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c37-8GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:28:42 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436832
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436832
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436832