I am grateful to the noble Baroness, regardless of whether she was trying to have some fun, for moving the amendment and allowing me the opportunity to attempt to explain why the Local Better Regulation Office has been established and, indeed, why the Government chose to name it as they did. As the Committee knows, in 2005 Philip Hampton, in his important report, reported to the Government on the enforcement of regulation in the UK. He noted that local authorities regulate an extremely diverse range of issues and he drew attention to the debt that we all owe local authorities for the protections that they provide—I pay tribute to them for that. I was sorry not to hear the noble Baroness make any reference to the necessity for regulation—and sometimes for new regulation—so that we can live in a more civilised country.
Local authority regulatory enforcers sit at the centre of this system, which has grown up over decades and has been shaped and reshaped by numerous Governments, including the noble Baroness’s, through initiatives and regulators. The system is inevitably complex, even very complex. Because of this complexity, local authority regulatory enforcement, as I think is generally accepted—
[The Sitting was suspended for a Division in the House from 3.37 to 3.47 pm.]
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bach
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c2-3GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:25:11 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436732
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436732
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436732