The question in which people are interested is whether there should be a referendum or not. The only excuse that the Foreign Secretary and the Government have for not holding a referendum is that this treaty is in some way fundamentally different from the constitution. However, a report by the European Scrutiny Committee stated"““The Reform Treaty””"
—this one—"““will introduce into the existing Treaties all the 'innovations'””"
that were in the constitution apart from the symbols, referring, I think, to the flag and the ““Ode to Joy””. Was the Scrutiny Committee wrong? If it was not, the Foreign Secretary is not being straight with the House.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Maples
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 21 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
470 c1245 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-11 17:46:27 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436441
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436441
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436441