I join those who have contributed to this Third Reading debate in welcoming the amended Bill and wishing it well. I understand that the Government give £6.5 billion annually in subsidy to the rail network; that is a sum of which any Government should be proud. However, it is interesting that, despite all the congestion problems that we have heard about, our railways still carry only 6 per cent. of all passenger travel. Some 80 per cent. of journeys are still undertaken by car. Although the channel tunnel rail link is rightly a priority, at some point in the not-too-distant future there needs to be either a shift or an increase in transport funding so that road users are treated equitably.
I thank the Minister again for the fair-minded way in which he has dealt with the Bill and for his approach throughout. If there is any justice in this world, he will be made Secretary of State at the next reshuffle.
Question put and agreed to.
Bill accordingly read the Third time, and passed.
Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Greg Knight
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
470 c1164 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:18:57 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436003
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436003
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436003