The Minister may say that, but I have learnt in life that that is not always a wise thing to do, although I know him to be a generous, affable and able man.
I accept the Minister's explanation of why he thinks the amendment is not necessary. However, we shall watch carefully to ensure that the short-term funding that he says is necessary does not extend into long-term funding. If that happened, that would be contrary to the Government's stated intention and become a problem for them. With those caveats, I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Amendment proposed: No. 4, page 1, line 5, at end add—"'( ) The powers of the Secretary of State under section 6 of the Railways Act 2005 shall be exercised in such a way so as to ensure that assets associated with the rail link at Waterloo Station are developed for the purpose of providing domestic rail services'.—[Stephen Hammond.]"
Question put, That the amendment be made:—
The House divided: Ayes 166, Noes 259.
Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Stephen Hammond
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
470 c1152 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:18:03 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435980
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435980
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435980