I, too, support the amendment and, indeed, the noble Lord, Lord Rix, explained it eloquently as he always does. Many parents struggle from one end of the country to the other to visit their children in 52-week residential care. It is important to point out that the amendment does not impose some prescriptive shackle on local authorities’ provision of care, because, where a child does have that contact with their family, the local authority is under no obligation to consider the young person as looked after; but, as the noble Lord, Lord Rix, said, too many children have no visits and we must be very mindful of their welfare. So I hope that the Minister can look favourably on the amendment.
Children and Young Persons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Morris of Bolton
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 17 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Children and Young Persons Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c602-3GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:28:16 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435682
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435682
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435682