I understand that there is a great deal more work to be done and I hope that the debates this afternoon will help in that work. As I understand it, there may be distribution not only of funds, but loans; in which case, the heading may be worth looking at, as it refers only to distribution of English expenditure. The Minister did not pick up the point that I made regarding ““must”” or ““may””. Quite unnecessarily, this clause restricts the use of funds to a specific range of subjects, when there may be more deserving causes. As I have been the MP for Worthing, and it is said that people go there to die and forget what they came for, my priorities may not necessarily be for young people, but specifically to state that the funds must be spent on young people, when there are many other deserving causes, seems unnecessarily restrictive.
Finally, in that context, the Minister may make alterations by order in relation to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. There is no order-making power in the clause dealing with England and that may be worthy of consideration—otherwise the Government may live to regret it.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Higgins
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c496GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:32:04 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_434282
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_434282
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_434282