I can assure the noble Lord that it is not shared by those on my side of the Committee. The Minister keeps referring to this as a private scheme; it is not. It is a statutory scheme and the Government have an obligation to make it work efficiently, effectively and equitably. My diagnosis is that the Bill does not do that. It may be that it will still not do that when we send it to another place, but at least it should go with powers built into it to ensure that it will operate well.
We resist the notion that this is simply a way of allowing banks and building societies to do what they want. The Bill should set out with precision the way in which money can, should and should not be transferred under the scheme. We have a difference of approach and we will, of course, return to the issue. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c353GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:36:35 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433084
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433084
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433084