I am not sure that I can respond to the noble Baroness’ interesting but challenging question directly, but let me adumbrate the principle again. First, as I said to the noble Lord, Lord Shutt, we are seeking to make sure that there are no undue obstructions on resources being made available to the scheme through the technical operations of banks. That is the purpose of the amendment. In response to the noble Baroness, the issue that I addressed was: if the account was transferred into the reclaim fund and the claimant appeared with a properly attested claim after the money was gone, of course the available resources would include the account and proper interest that might have accrued. It looks as if I am not answering the noble Baroness’s direct question, so I will draw a line and give her a chance to press me further.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c350GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:36:31 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433076
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433076
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433076